Hall v. State of Missouri
||State of Missouri
||January 25, 2013
||Missouri Eastern District Court
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - City
||David D. Noce
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 7, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to formally consent, in writing, to the Court's characterization of the instant filing as § 2254 motion. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form petitioner for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner consents to the characterization, then hemust file an amended 167; 2254 petition on the Court- provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner does not consent to the characterization of the instant filing as a § 2254motion, or if petitioner fails to timely respond to this Order, then the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice and without characterizing the filing as a § 2254 motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner submits an amended petition, he must also pay the $5 statutory filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. ( Response to Court due by 3/9/2013.) Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 3/9/2013.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 2/7/13. (KKS)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?