Walker v. Steele

Walker v. Steele

Petitioner:	Darold Walker
Respondent:	Troy Steele
Case Number:	4:2013cv00182
Filed:	January 25, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	John A. Ross
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 15, 2016	Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis 22 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Application for Reconsideration for Certificates of Appealability 20 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/15/2016. (KMS)
February 16, 2016	Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Darold Walker's Petition under 28 U.S.C. §2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State Custody 1 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Compel St ate of Missouri to Provide Entire Record 15 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Request for an Evidentiary Hearing 16 isDENIED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that because Petitioner cannot make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See 28U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). 15 MOTION to Compel filed by Petitioner Darold Walker, 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Darold Walker, 16 PRO SE MOTION filed by Petitioner Darold Walker. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 2/16/16. (KKS)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 15, 2016

Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis 22 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Application for Reconsideration for Certificates of Appealability 20 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/15/2016. (KMS)

February 16, 2016

Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Darold Walker's Petition under 28 U.S.C. §2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State Custody 1 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Compel St ate of Missouri to Provide Entire Record 15 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Request for an Evidentiary Hearing 16 isDENIED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that because Petitioner cannot make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See 28U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). 15 MOTION to Compel filed by Petitioner Darold Walker, 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Darold Walker, 16 PRO SE MOTION filed by Petitioner Darold Walker. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 2/16/16. (KKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Steele
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Darold Walker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Troy Steele
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?