Lebon v. St. Louis Metro Police Department et al
| Thomas Paul Lebon |
| St. Louis Metro Police Department and Thomas Scanlon |
| 4:2013cv00256 |
| February 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Terry I. Adelman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Missouri Public Defenders Office to produce a copy of the trial transcript and booking sheet (ECF No. 37 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 40 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 8/5/14. (KJS)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service shall serve defendant Thomas Scanlon in accordance with Rule 4(e)(2)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the Marshals Service shall serve the de fendant by delivering the alias summons and amended complaint [Doc. # 6 ] to Thomas Scanlon, personally. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall provide the Marshals Service with a copy of this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 10/8/13. (KJS)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, as to defendant Thomas Scanlon in his individual capacity, the Clerk of Court shall issue process on the amended complaint under the Waiver of Service Agreement the Court maintains with the City of St. Louis City Counselors Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for default judgment [Doc. # 20 ] is DENIED, without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 9/19/13. (KJS)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to be issued upon the amended complaint as to defendant Thomas Scanlon in his individual capacity. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Scanlon, in his indi vidual capacity, shall reply to the amended complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See 42U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's official-ca pacity claims againstdefendant Thomas Scanlon are DISMISSED without prejudice. See 42 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this case as Thomas Paul Lebon v. Thomas Scanlon. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to this Courts differentiated case management system, this case is assigned to Track 5B (prisoner actions-standard). A separate Order of Partial Dismissal of Claims shall accompany thisMemorandum and Order. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the amended complaint at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a written supplement to his amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, stating whether he is suing defendant Thomas Scanlon in his official capacity, his individual capacity, or both his official and individual capacities, in accordance with the specific instructions set fo rth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to supplement his amended complaint in accordance with this Court's instructions will result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to him. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 06/24/2013. (DJO)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this case as Thomas Paul Lebon v. St. Louis Metro Police Department, Thomas Scanlon, and Daniel Isom. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to pro ceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $1.75 within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days, without first showing good cause, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice to plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before April 15, 2013, that complies with this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in addition to a copy of this Order, the Clerk shall mail plaintiff a copy of the Courts form for prisoners to file a "Complaint U nder the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. If the case is dismissed for non-compli ance with this Order, the dismissal will not constitute a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 4/13/2013., Response to Court due by 4/15/2013.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 3/14/2013. (KMS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
