Purzel Video GMBH v. Does 1-32

Purzel Video GMBH v. Does 1-32

Plaintiff:	Purzel Video GMBH
Defendant:	Does 1-32
Case Number:	4:2013cv00449
Filed:	March 11, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Adair
Presiding Judge:	Audrey G. Fleissig
Nature of Suit:	Copyright
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 6, 2013	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Doe #2 through Doe #27, and Doe #29 through Doe #32, are SEVERED from this action and the claims against them are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for extension of time to name and serve defendants (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED as to Doe #1, and DENIED as moot as to all Defendants other than Doe #1. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 9/6/13. (JWJ)
March 20, 2013	Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ( SEE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS ) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for leave to take discoveryprior to the Rule 26(f) conference is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 3.) filed by Plaintiff Purzel Video GMBH. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/20/13. (JWJ)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 6, 2013

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Doe #2 through Doe #27, and Doe #29 through Doe #32, are SEVERED from this action and the claims against them are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for extension of time to name and serve defendants (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED as to Doe #1, and DENIED as moot as to all Defendants other than Doe #1. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 9/6/13. (JWJ)

March 20, 2013

Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ( SEE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS ) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for leave to take discoveryprior to the Rule 26(f) conference is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 3.) filed by Plaintiff Purzel Video GMBH. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/20/13. (JWJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Purzel Video GMBH v. Does 1-32
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Purzel Video GMBH
Represented By:	Paul A. Lesko
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-32
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?