Morgan v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Mary C. Morgan
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	4:2013cv00766
Filed:	April 18, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Francois
Presiding Judge:	Lewis M. Blanton
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 26, 2020	Filing 35 MEMORANDUM: Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the Commissioner's decision is not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Upon remand, the Commissioner should consider the educational records, including IQ scores an d psychological testing, and formulate a new RFC that is supported by substantial evidence. The Commissioner should also consider the effects Morgan's borderline intellectual functioning has on her hearing impairment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 03/26/2020. (CMH)
December 9, 2013	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION for Hearing filed by Plaintiff Mary C. Morgan, MOTION DENIED AS MOOT; 17 MOTION to Remand Case to Social Security Administration filed by Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin motion is GRANTED. IT IS HEREB Y ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Remand (Doc. No. 35) be and it is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the this cause be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for those reasons set forth in this Memorandum and Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs pro se Motion for Hearing (Doc. No. 9) be and it is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton on 12/9/13. (CSG)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 26, 2020

Filing 35 MEMORANDUM: Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the Commissioner's decision is not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Upon remand, the Commissioner should consider the educational records, including IQ scores an d psychological testing, and formulate a new RFC that is supported by substantial evidence. The Commissioner should also consider the effects Morgan's borderline intellectual functioning has on her hearing impairment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 03/26/2020. (CMH)

December 9, 2013

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION for Hearing filed by Plaintiff Mary C. Morgan, MOTION DENIED AS MOOT; 17 MOTION to Remand Case to Social Security Administration filed by Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin motion is GRANTED. IT IS HEREB Y ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Remand (Doc. No. 35) be and it is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the this cause be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for those reasons set forth in this Memorandum and Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs pro se Motion for Hearing (Doc. No. 9) be and it is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton on 12/9/13. (CSG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary C. Morgan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Nicholas P. Llewellyn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?