Jones v. Colvin

Jones v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Kimnatta Maria Jones
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	4:2013cv00824
Filed:	April 30, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Shirley P. Mensah
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 8, 2014	Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Amended Motion for Attorney's Fees (Docs. 21 & 26) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded EAJA attorney's fees in the amount of $2,175.35, subject to offset for any pre-existing debt Plaintiff owes to the United States. After determining whether Plaintiff owes any debt to the United States that is subject to offset, Defendant is directed to pay the EAJA fees directly to Plaintiff's attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah on 1/8/14. (LAH)
August 19, 2013	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Reverse and Remand Doc. 17 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah on 8/19/2013. (RAK)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 8, 2014

Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Amended Motion for Attorney's Fees (Docs. 21 & 26) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded EAJA attorney's fees in the amount of $2,175.35, subject to offset for any pre-existing debt Plaintiff owes to the United States. After determining whether Plaintiff owes any debt to the United States that is subject to offset, Defendant is directed to pay the EAJA fees directly to Plaintiff's attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah on 1/8/14. (LAH)

August 19, 2013

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Reverse and Remand Doc. 17 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah on 8/19/2013. (RAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimnatta Maria Jones
Represented By:	David D. Camp
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Jane Rund
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?