Jones v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Eastern District Jones v. Social Security Administration

Jones v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Charlita K. Jones
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	4:2013cv01007
Filed:	May 24, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Adair
Presiding Judge:	Shirley P. Mensah
Presiding Judge:	Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 8, 2014	Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application for Attorney's Fees in the amount of $6,161.59 # 22 is GRANTED. The fees are awarded to Plaintiff and shall be paid by the Social Security Administration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for reimbursement for the $400.00 filing fee is GRANTED. The fee is awarded to Plaintiff and shall be paid by the Judgment Fund administered by the United States Treasury. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 12/8/14. (KXS)
September 25, 2014	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah [#20] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence-four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/25/14. (JWD)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 8, 2014

Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application for Attorney's Fees in the amount of $6,161.59 # 22 is GRANTED. The fees are awarded to Plaintiff and shall be paid by the Social Security Administration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for reimbursement for the $400.00 filing fee is GRANTED. The fee is awarded to Plaintiff and shall be paid by the Judgment Fund administered by the United States Treasury. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 12/8/14. (KXS)

September 25, 2014

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah [#20] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence-four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/25/14. (JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlita K. Jones
Represented By:	Traci L. Severs
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Jane Rund
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?