Miller v. Missouri Department of Social Services/Division of Youth Services
Marva Lynnette Miller |
Missouri Department of Social Services/Division of Youth Services |
4:2013cv01102 |
June 10, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - City |
Nannette A. Baker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Notice of Appeal out of Time is DENIED. [Doc. 84.] 84 Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 11/10/15. (CLA) |
Filing 81 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 70 .] A separate final Judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 10/6/15. (KJS) |
Filing 68 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 52.] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel is DENIED. [Doc. 54.] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Supplemental Motion for Su mmary Judgment is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 62.]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may file additional motions for summary judgment regarding Plaintiffs harassment, hostile work environment, and retaliation claims no later than June 1, 2015. IT IS FU RTHER ORDERED that the current trial setting of June 1, 2015 is VACATED and will be reset at a later date. A separate partial Judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. 62 52 Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 5/12/15. (CLA) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue as to defendant the Missouri Department o f Social Services/Division of Youth Services. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue as to defendants Pokorny,Williams, Smiley orCollier because, as to these individuals, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process on plaintiffs claims for whistleblower and retaliation for filing workers compensation claims, as these allegations fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. An Order of Partial Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order. 2 Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 7/1/13. (CLA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Miller v. Missouri Department of Social Services/Division of Youth Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marva Lynnette Miller | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Missouri Department of Social Services/Division of Youth Services | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.