Schaefer v. Marty Cancila Dodge Chysler Jeep Sales

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Eastern District Schaefer v. Marty Cancila Dodge Chysler Jeep Sales

Schaefer v. Marty Cancila Dodge Chysler Jeep Sales

Plaintiff:	Raymond J Schaefer
Defendant:	Marty Cancila Dodge, Chysyler, Jeep
Case Number:	4:2013cv01215
Filed:	June 26, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Charles
Presiding Judge:	Thomas C. Mummert
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 22, 2014	Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Recent Supplemental Motion to Dismiss 29 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted until May 9, 2014, to file his response to Defen dants Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be docketed in Loney A. Haney v. Florissant Dodge Sales, Inc., Case No. 4:13cv1213 CDP, and Raymond J. Schaefer v. Florissant Dodge Sales, Inc., Case No. 4:13cv1215 TCM. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/22/14. (ARL)
September 13, 2013	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Consolidate 7 will be GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that once discovery is completed, a scheduling order relating to dispositive motions and trial dates for each case will be set by the Judge assigned the case. See Order for full details. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/13/13. (ARL)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 22, 2014

Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Recent Supplemental Motion to Dismiss 29 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted until May 9, 2014, to file his response to Defen dants Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be docketed in Loney A. Haney v. Florissant Dodge Sales, Inc., Case No. 4:13cv1213 CDP, and Raymond J. Schaefer v. Florissant Dodge Sales, Inc., Case No. 4:13cv1215 TCM. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/22/14. (ARL)

September 13, 2013

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Consolidate 7 will be GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that once discovery is completed, a scheduling order relating to dispositive motions and trial dates for each case will be set by the Judge assigned the case. See Order for full details. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/13/13. (ARL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schaefer v. Marty Cancila Dodge Chysler Jeep Sales
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Marty Cancila Dodge, Chysyler, Jeep
Represented By:	Lauren B. Harris
Represented By:	Christine A. Vaporean
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond J Schaefer
Represented By:	David R. Swimmer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?