Rogers v. Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc. et al
| Shellie L Rogers |
| Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc. and Augustine Pacheco |
| 4:2013cv01448 |
| July 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
186
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to alter or amend judgment 177 is GRANTED for the reasons discussed above. The judgment is amended to reflect that each side will bear its own costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for bill of costs 181 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on February 11, 2016. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to amend [# 59 ] is granted and the proposed amended complaint is deemed filed today. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 8/3/2015. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to remand [# 14 ] is denied. This case will be set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference by separate order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 03/31/2014. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
