Cromwell v. GC Services, L.P.
| Retasha Cromwell |
| GC Services, L.P. and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
| 4:2013cv01589 |
| August 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, file separate motions for entry of default by the Clerk of the Court under Federal Rule of Civil 1In addition to being electronically filed as a .pdf attachment to the motion (s) for default, a courtesy copy of all proposed orders should be sent in a word processing format to the Courts proposed orders e-mail inbox, at MOED_Proposed_Orders@moed.uscourts.gov. See Administrative Procedur es for Case Management/Electronic Case Filing, § II. J. Procedure 55(a) and for default judgment under Rule 55(b), supported by all necessary affidavits and documentation, as well as proposed orders for the Courts consideration.1 Failure to com ply timely with this order may result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs claims against defendants Does 1-10 are DISMISSED without prejudice. An order of partial dismissal will accompany this order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 10/1/2013. (RAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
