Neidenbach et al v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Dale Neidenbach and Kim Neidenbach
Defendant: Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_claimant: Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_defendant: Dale Neidenbach and Kim Neidenbach
Case Number: 4:2013cv01604
Filed: August 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 83 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Amica Mutual Insurance Companys motion for Bill of Costs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of the Court shall tax costs of this matter in favor of defendant Amica Mutual Insurance Company and against plaintiffs Dale Neidenbach and Kim Neidenbach in the amount of Four Thousand Fifty-Four Dollars ($4,054.00). [Doc. 79] Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/14/2016. (MRC)
February 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Amica Mutual Insurance Company's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. Consistent with the terms of this Memorandum and Order, the motion for summary jud gment is GRANTED to the extent that Amica Mutual Insurance Company is entitled to recover the advance payments it made to or on behalf ofDale and Kim Neidenbach, which total Fifty Eight Thousand, Seven Hundred Nine Dollars and Eighty-Five Cents (� 36;58,709.85). In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. [Doc. 64] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that two (2) weeks from the date of this Memorandum and Order, Dale or Kim Neidenbach shall file a written declaration or affidavit with the Court stat ing that they have returned to Amica Mutual Insurance Company Check No. 4441094, in the amount of $6,350.00, or that Check No. 4441094 has been destroyed. An appropriate partial judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 2/9/2016. (MRC)
March 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Amica Mutual Insurance Company's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 48] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dale and Kim Neidenbach's motions for a Daubert< /U> hearing and to exclude expert opinions are DENIED as moot. [Doc. 35] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the April 13, 2015 trial date is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before March 31, 2015, and in accordance with this Memora ndum and Order, Amica Mutual Insurance Company shall either (1) file a summary judgment motion or other appropriate dispositive motion on its counterclaim, or (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss its counterclaim. Plaintiffs Dale and Kim Neiden bach shall file their memorandum in opposition to any such motion in accordance with the time limits of this Court's Local Rules. Any reply shall also be filed in accordance with the Local Rules. Failure to comply with the terms of this Memoran dum and Order shall result in the dismissal of Amica Mutual Insurance Company's counterclaim. An appropriate partial judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. ( Response to Court due by 3/31/2015.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/10/2015. (MRC)
August 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Amica Mutual Insurance Company's motion to strike is DENIED. [Doc. 40 ] Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 8/18/14. (KXS)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended answer to the counterclaim is DENIED as moot. Under the applicable Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, leave of Court is not required at this time. [Doc. 34 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall detach and docket plaintiffs' amended answer to defendant's counterclaim, which was attached to their motion for leave. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/30/2014. (NEB)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs Dale and Kim Neidenbach's motion to dismiss defendant's counterclaim is DENIED. [Doc. 20] Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/23/2014. (NCL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neidenbach et al v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dale Neidenbach
Represented By: David C. Knieriem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Neidenbach
Represented By: David C. Knieriem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Robert W. Cockerham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Robert W. Cockerham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Dale Neidenbach
Represented By: David C. Knieriem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Kim Neidenbach
Represented By: David C. Knieriem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?