Davis v. Lancaster et al
Plaintiff: Frederick P. Davis
Defendant: Timothy R. Lancaster, Troy Steele, Fred Johnson, Robert Savage, Sheri Shawver, Stanley Pruitt, Dan Bryan and Jamie Crump
Case Number: 4:2013cv01638
Filed: August 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Francois
Presiding Judge: Henry E. Autrey
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 432 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees, [Doc. No. 397 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $11,250.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Costs, [Doc. No. 399 ] is GRANTED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded costs in the amount of $1,389.07. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/18/19. (KJS)
October 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 197 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Doc. No. 184], is denied without prejudice. 184 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/24/16. (CLA) cc: petitioner
June 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 142 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 104] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 72] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiffs claims that he was denied access to courts and his legal files in retaliation for Webb; that Defendant Savage refused to give him a reprisal grievance form in retalia tion for Webb; that he was placed in danger by giving his enemy the impression that he had made a knife for use on this enemy; and that he was wrongfully transferred from PCC to ERDCC in retaliation for Webb.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is ent ered in favor of Defendants Sheri Shawver and Robert Savage.An appropriate Judgment will accompany this Opinion, Memorandum and Order. 104 72 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 6/25/15. (CLA) (Main Document 142 replaced on 6/25/2015) (CLA).
November 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion to dismiss [ECF No. 11] is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to disqualify counsel[ECF No. 13] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pl aintiffs motion for fraud on the court[ECF No. 20] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for sanctions [ECF No.21] is DENIED. A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously. 11 13 20 21 Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 11/14/13. (CLA)
August 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $48.37 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or causeprocess to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Timothy Lancaster, Troy Steele, Fred Johnson, Robert Savage, Sheri Shawve r, Stanley Pruitt, Dan Bryan, and Jamie Crump. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants Timothy Lancaster, Troy Steele, Fred Johnson, Robert Savage, Sheri Shawver, Stanley Pruitt, Dan Bryan, and Jamie Crump sha ll reply to plaintiffs claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court will dismiss defendants Terry White, Daniel Blair, Michael Miller, and Lois Dix because, as to these defendants, the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: PrisonerStandard. An Order of Partial Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously with this Memorandum and Order. 2 ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 9/22/2013.) Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 8/22/13. (CLA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Lancaster et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederick P. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy R. Lancaster
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Troy Steele
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred Johnson
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Savage
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheri Shawver
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stanley Pruitt
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Bryan
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jamie Crump
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?