Hilbill Properties, LLC v. Jacobson Companies

Plaintiff: Hilbill Properties, LLC
Defendant: Jacobson Companies
Case Number: 4:2013cv01663
Filed: August 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: E. Richard Webber
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2014 Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Renewed Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Respond to Discovery" 47 , is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on November 19, 2014. (MCB)
September 10, 2014 Filing 44 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to its First Request for Production of Documents from Defendant" [ECF No. 38 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jacobsen shall produce copies of all leases regarding the Property, into which it entered, with any entity, from 2006 to present; evidence of insurance policies pertaining to the Property that are particular to each lease or Original L essee; real estate payments made in conjunction with the Property; construction requests, bids, invoices, or statements concerning the Property; names of companies performing construction or repairs to the Property; and documents showing allocation o f costs for insurance, real estate payments, construction, repairs, and real estate taxes pertaining to the Property. Jacobsen shall produce documents relating to its budgeting for repairs and its payment of real estate taxes that are subject to Leas e 1 and Lease 3, for the time period 2006 through 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hilbill's request for an award of costs and fees incurred in securing Jacobsens responsive productions is HELD in ABEYANCE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall confer, prepare, and submit a proposed Amended Case Management Order to the Court, within two weeks of this Order. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 09/10/2014. (CBL)
October 29, 2013 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Jacobson's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 9 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Jacobson's Motion for a More Definite Statement is GRANTED. Hilbill's amended compl aint, to be filed in twenty (20) days, shall state in separate counts the breaches and damages occurring under each individual lease. (Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 11/18/2013.) Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on October 29, 2013. (BRP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hilbill Properties, LLC v. Jacobson Companies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hilbill Properties, LLC
Represented By: John Hein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacobson Companies
Represented By: John F. Horvath
Represented By: Ted L. Perryman
Represented By: John I. Schaberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?