Brown v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Patricia Ann Brown
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 4:2013cv01693
Filed: August 28, 2013
Court: Missouri Eastern District Court
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Washington
Referring Judge: Shirley P. Mensah
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 26, 2014 29 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED and remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this Memorandum and Order. A separate judgment in accord with this Memorandum and Order is entered on this date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah on 6/26/14. (JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Ann Brown
Represented By: Eve D. Dake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Jane Rund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?