Young v. Pash
| Keith Stanley Young |
| Ellis McSwain, Jr and Rhonda Pash |
| 4:2013cv01880 |
| September 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| DeKalb |
| Rodney W. Sippel |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Doc. # 2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners Motion for Leave to File Supplement and Amended Combined Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Subjiciendum and Petition for Writ of Outi Timet, or in the alternative Writ of Error Nobis and Audita Querela or other relief under All Writs Act Doc. # 15 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court will allow pe titioner to file the supplement to his amended habeas corpus petition [Doc. # 15 , pages 1-22] and will deny the motion in all other respects [Doc. #15, pages 23-58]. The denial iswithout prejudice to refiling petitioners claims on a Court-provided f orm(s) in a separate action(s), if petitioner wishes to do so. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel Doc. # 4 , motion for transcript Doc. # 5 , motion for evidentiary hearing Doc. # 6 , and motion to file a combined petition Doc. # 7 are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners Application for Stay and Abeyance Doc. # 8 3 and motion for certificate of appealability Doc. # 14 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's amende d petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Docs. # 16 and # 15 , pages 1-22] is DENIED without prejudice. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate ofappealability. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/29/14. (ARL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
