Williams v. Steele

Williams v. Steele

Petitioner:	Rollan A. Williams
Respondent:	Troy Steele
Case Number:	4:2013cv01903
Filed:	September 20, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 19, 2016	Filing 37 ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and incorporated herein. [Doc. 23] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rollan A. Williams' Petition for Writ of H abeas Corpus pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. [Doc. 1]IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat this matter is DISMISSED, with no further action to take place herein. An appropriate judgment will accompany this order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/19/2016. (MRC)
October 30, 2013	Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. Doc. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motions for extension of time and for abeyance are DENIED without prejudice. D ocs. 7 , 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motion for discovery is DENIED. Doc. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motions for liberal construction and for appointment of a magistrate judge are DENIED. Doc. 5 , 6 . Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 10/30/2013. (RAK)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 19, 2016

Filing 37 ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and incorporated herein. [Doc. 23] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rollan A. Williams' Petition for Writ of H abeas Corpus pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. [Doc. 1]IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat this matter is DISMISSED, with no further action to take place herein. An appropriate judgment will accompany this order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/19/2016. (MRC)

October 30, 2013

Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. Doc. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motions for extension of time and for abeyance are DENIED without prejudice. D ocs. 7 , 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motion for discovery is DENIED. Doc. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motions for liberal construction and for appointment of a magistrate judge are DENIED. Doc. 5 , 6 . Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 10/30/2013. (RAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Steele
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Rollan A. Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Troy Steele
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?