Vaughn v. Vilsack
| Bill Vaughn |
| Tom J. Vilsack |
| 4:2013cv02427 |
| December 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Carol E. Jackson |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate a Void Final Judgment (ECF No. 39 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 1/7/2015. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Sanctions [ECF No. 34 ] is GRANTED . Plaintiffs case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate judgment is entered herewith. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 10/15/2014. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his Initial Disclosures no later than Wednesday, October 1, 2014. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Court's Order, then the Court may sanction Plaintiff, including possibly dismissing Plaintiff's case for failure to prosecute. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection to Jurisdiction and Order (ECF No. 22), Notice of Common Law Jurisdiction (ECF No. 23), and Notice of Trial Date (ECF No. 26), to the extent that they are objections to this Court's jurisdiction and the Case Management Order, are DENIED. (Response to Court due by 10/1/2014.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/22/2014. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection to Jurisdiction and Order (ECF No. 20 ), which the Court construes as a motion to strike the Case Management Order, is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 8/28/2014. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs first amended pro se complaint for failure to state a claim for relief, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. # 5 ] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs first pro se complaint [Doc. # 2 ] is moot. MOTION to Dismiss Case. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 6/3/14. (KKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vaughn v. Vilsack | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tom J. Vilsack | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bill Vaughn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
