Smith v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis Pension Plan for Nonschedule Employees
| Linda Smith |
| Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis Pension Plan for Nonschedule Employees |
| 4:2013cv02500 |
| December 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Rodney W. Sippel |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than April 4, 2016, the parties shall file a joint memorandum advising me of the status of this case and whether a new briefing schedule is required in light of the decisions from the Seventh and Eighth Circuit Courts of Appeal. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions against one or both parties. Response to Court due by 4/4/2016. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/29/16. (CAR)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF STAY: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this case is stayed pending further Order of the Court, and the parties shall notify me of the decision issued by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in the appeal of Ingram v. Terminal Railroad As soc. of St. Louis Pension Plan, Case No. 4:11 CV 1327 HEA, by filing a joint memorandum attaching a copy of the decision within 10 days of its issuance. Within 10 days of the mandate being issued in that case, the parties shall file a joint motion to lift the stay and propose new briefing and/or scheduling deadlines, if required. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 7/22/15. (ARL)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF STAY: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 14 is denied without prejudice to being refiled as set out above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is stayed pending further Order of the Cour t, and the parties shall notify me of decisions issued in the two cases discussed above by filing a joint memorandum attaching a copy of the decision within 10 days of its issuance. Within 10 days of the last decision being issued, the parties shall file a joint motion to lift the stay and propose new briefing and/or scheduling deadlines, if required.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/11/14. (LGK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis Pension Plan for Nonschedule Employees | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Smith | |
| Represented By: | Terry N. Brown |
| Represented By: | Matthew B. Leppert |
| Represented By: | James I. Singer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis Pension Plan for Nonschedule Employees | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
