Simms v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Michael W. Simms
Defendant: Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, St. Louis County Department of Revenue, Federal National Mortgage Association, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and South & Associates, PC
Case Number: 4:2014cv00243
Filed: February 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant South & Associates, P.C.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Petition is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the motion is GRANTED as to the tort claim for wrongful foreclosure in Count I, and the quiet title claim against South in Count II; the motion is DENIED as to the equitable foreclosure claim in Count I. [Doc. 26 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to File Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED in pa rt and DENIED in part as follows: The motion is (1) DENIED as to a tort claim for wrongful foreclosure, unless plaintiff alleges that he was not in default under the mortgage when the foreclosure proceedings began; (2) GRANTED as to an equitable f oreclosure claim; (3) GRANTED as to a quiet title claim, except that South & Associates, PC shall not be named as a defendant therein unless plaintiff alleges facts to show that South claims some title, estate or interest in the subject property; a nd (4) DENIED as futile on the claim for abuse of process. [Doc. 44 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file any amended complaint by September 15, 2014, and the same shall be in accordance with the terms of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will issue an appropriate order of partial dismissal in accordance with this Memorandum and Order after plaintiff's amended complaint is filed. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/3/14. (KXS)
April 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay of this matter is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Remand is DENIED. [Doc. 11]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs claims against defendants St. Louis County, Missouri ( sued as St. Louis County Department of Revenue) and the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District are DISMISSED. An order of partial dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. re: 11 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Plaintiff Michael W. Simms Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/18/14. (JWJ)
April 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER CONCERNING REMOVAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by April 18, 2014, defendant Nationstar shall file an Amended Notice of Removal which shall allege facts establishing plaintiffs citizenship and the state(s) of citizenship of Nationstars ultimate member, NSM Holdings, Inc., both at the time of filing and the time of removal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if defendant Nationstar does not timely and fully comply with this order, this matter will be remanded to the state court from which it was removed, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other proceedings in this case are STAYED pending further order of this Court. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/15/2014. (RAK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simms v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Represented By: Kenneth D. Goins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Louis County Department of Revenue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association
Represented By: Matthew J. Gartner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Represented By: Matthew J. Gartner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South & Associates, PC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael W. Simms
Represented By: Gregory P. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?