Gillispie v. Steele

Gillispie v. Steele

Petitioner:	Artoska Gillispie
Respondent:	Troy Steele
Case Number:	4:2014cv00257
Filed:	February 12, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	Nannette A. Baker
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 25, 2020	Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Motion for Relief from Judgment Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) Motion is DENIED and DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as a second or successive habeas motion. [Doc. 38 .]IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that the Clerk of Court shall substitute Bill Stange in the place of Troy Steele as the Respondent in this action, pursuant to Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 02/25/2020. (AAT)
March 29, 2017	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. [Doc. 1.]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a separate judgment will be entered this same date.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated herein, any motion by Artoska Gillispie for a Certificate of Appealability will be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 3/29/17. (CLA)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 25, 2020

Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Motion for Relief from Judgment Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) Motion is DENIED and DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as a second or successive habeas motion. [Doc. 38 .]IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that the Clerk of Court shall substitute Bill Stange in the place of Troy Steele as the Respondent in this action, pursuant to Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 02/25/2020. (AAT)

March 29, 2017

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. [Doc. 1.]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a separate judgment will be entered this same date.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated herein, any motion by Artoska Gillispie for a Certificate of Appealability will be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 3/29/17. (CLA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gillispie v. Steele
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Artoska Gillispie
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Troy Steele
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Represented By:	Terrence M. Messonnier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?