Rollen v. Cassady
||April 2, 2014
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||St. Louis Office
||Carol E. Jackson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 9, 2014
MEMORANDUM Finally, petitioner has failed to demonstrate that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition is successive. Thus, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). An order of dismissal will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 5/9/14. (KXS)
|April 7, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to petitioner a "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit in Support - Habeas Cases"form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to pay the statutory filing fee of $5.00, or to submit a completed form "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit in Support - Habeas Cases." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss this action without prejudice. (ORDER & FORMS MAILED TO PETITIONER) Response to Court due by 5/7/2014.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 4/7/14. (KKS)
|April 3, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER That petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion be removed from petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 Habeas Petition, Cause No. 4:06-CV-1114-CEJ, and filed as a new case with a new cause number.Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on April 2, 2014. (WAF)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?