Peterka v. Maplewood, Missouri, City of, et al.
| Timothy D. Peterka |
| Maplewood, Missouri, City of and Anthony Cavanaugh |
| 4:2014cv00823 |
| April 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| E. Richard Webber |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Petition Out of Time [ECF No. 58 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 5/7/15. (EAB)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Directed at Defendant City of Maplewood is GRANTED, in part and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant City of Maplewood shall produce the aforementioned documents to Plaintiff within ten days. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 03/13/2015. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count IV 16 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint to plead the applicable statutory provision. Plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint no later than July 15, 2014. (Response to Court due by 7/15/2014.) Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on July 9, 2014. (MCB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
