Whispering Oaks Residential Care Facility, LLC et al v. AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. et al
Naren Chaganti, Whispering Oaks RCF Management Co. Inc. and Whispering Oaks Residential Care Facility, LLC |
AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc. |
4:2014cv01002 |
May 29, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Carol E. Jackson |
Other Personal Property Damage |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendant Cricket Communications, Inc. to dismiss all claims of plaintiff Naren Chaganti for lack of standing [Doc. #8] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Cri cket to dismiss Counts for failure to state a claim for relief [Doc. #10] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Cricket to dismiss plaintiffs prayer for punitive damages [Doc. #12] is granted.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 10/22/2014. (KMS) |
Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to remand [Doc. #15] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Cricket Communications, Inc., shall have until July 15, 2014, to file an amended notice of removal alleging facts establishing subject-matter jurisdiction. ( Response to Court due by 7/15/2014.) Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 7/7/2014. (KMS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.