Whispering Oaks Residential Care Facility, LLC et al v. AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Naren Chaganti, Whispering Oaks RCF Management Co. Inc. and Whispering Oaks Residential Care Facility, LLC
Defendant: AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2014cv01002
Filed: May 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Carol E. Jackson
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendant Cricket Communications, Inc. to dismiss all claims of plaintiff Naren Chaganti for lack of standing [Doc. #8] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Cri cket to dismiss Counts for failure to state a claim for relief [Doc. #10] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Cricket to dismiss plaintiffs prayer for punitive damages [Doc. #12] is granted.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 10/22/2014. (KMS)
July 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to remand [Doc. #15] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Cricket Communications, Inc., shall have until July 15, 2014, to file an amended notice of removal alleging facts establishing subject-matter jurisdiction. ( Response to Court due by 7/15/2014.) Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 7/7/2014. (KMS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whispering Oaks Residential Care Facility, LLC et al v. AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Naren Chaganti
Represented By: Naren Chaganti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Whispering Oaks RCF Management Co. Inc.
Represented By: Naren Chaganti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Whispering Oaks Residential Care Facility, LLC
Represented By: Naren Chaganti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc.
Represented By: Steven J. Hughes
Represented By: Jerod D. Luhning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cricket Communications, Inc.
Represented By: John A. Michener
Represented By: Brian R. Shank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?