Rowe v. Villmer

Rowe v. Villmer

Petitioner:	Hernando D. Rowe
Respondent:	Tom Villmer
Case Number:	4:2014cv01108
Filed:	June 17, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Francois
Presiding Judge:	Terry I. Adelman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 20, 2016	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition of Hernando D. Rowe for habeas corpus relief [ECF No. 1] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition may be denied without the need for an evidentiary hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED that a Certificate of Appealability will not be issued by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for a ruling on his petition [ECF No. 15] is DENIED as moot. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date.. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 1/20/16. (LGK)
September 5, 2014	Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket No. 4 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If the Court later determines that counsel is necessary, the appropriate order will be issued.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 9/5/14. (KKS)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 20, 2016

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition of Hernando D. Rowe for habeas corpus relief [ECF No. 1] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition may be denied without the need for an evidentiary hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED that a Certificate of Appealability will not be issued by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for a ruling on his petition [ECF No. 15] is DENIED as moot. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date.. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 1/20/16. (LGK)

September 5, 2014

Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket No. 4 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If the Court later determines that counsel is necessary, the appropriate order will be issued.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 9/5/14. (KKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rowe v. Villmer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Hernando D. Rowe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Tom Villmer
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Represented By:	Terrence M. Messonnier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?