White v. Wallace

White v. Wallace

Petitioner:	Dewayne White
Respondent:	Ian Wallace
Case Number:	4:2014cv01357
Filed:	August 4, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Mississippi
Presiding Judge:	Shirley P. Mensah
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 2, 2017	Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner motion for extension of time [# 31 ] is denied. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 6/2/17. (JAB)
April 17, 2017	Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that petitioner has failed to establish that he is entitled to relief based on state court proceedings that were contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly e stablished federal law, or based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Petitioner has also failed to make a substantial showing of the denial o f a constitutional right. Therefore, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). A judgment in accordance with this Memorandum will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 4/17/2017. (CLO)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 2, 2017

Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner motion for extension of time [# 31 ] is denied. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 6/2/17. (JAB)

April 17, 2017

Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that petitioner has failed to establish that he is entitled to relief based on state court proceedings that were contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly e stablished federal law, or based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Petitioner has also failed to make a substantial showing of the denial o f a constitutional right. Therefore, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). A judgment in accordance with this Memorandum will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 4/17/2017. (CLO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Wallace
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Dewayne White
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Ian Wallace
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?