Krebs v. Estate of Joseph William Krebs et al
Joseph Matthew Krebs |
Estate of Joseph William Krebs, Charles Buddy Krebs, Met-Life Insurance and John and Jane Does |
4:2014cv01408 |
August 13, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Washington |
John A. Ross |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Met-Life 25 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Charles Buddy Krebs Motions to Dismiss [20, 33] are GRANTED in part.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Companys Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief May be Granted 34 is GRANTED in part. IT IF FINALLY ORDERED that the Plaintiffs pending Motions for Discovery 28 , and Extension of Time 41 are DENIED as moot. A separate Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/5/15. (ARL) |
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time 24 1s GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted an extension of time until December 20, 2014, to file his 'response to Defendant Charles Buddy Krebs' motion to dismiss. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 11/18/14. (LGK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.