McDaniel v. City of Warrenton et al
| Jasmine McDaniel |
| Rebecca Winka-Nordman, Michael Wright, City of Warrenton and Wesley Clay Dalton |
| 4:2014cv01665 |
| September 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Audrain |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of this action [ECF No. 10] is DENIED. 10 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/21/14. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
7
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is GRANTED FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $18.35 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make her remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) her name; (2) her prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an o riginal proceeding. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel [ECF No. 6 ] is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/29/2014. (CLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
