Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al
Plaintiff: Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Defendant: Verizon California, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2014cv01750
Filed: October 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Within US but Outside District
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint status memorandum within 10 days of the date of this Order advising me whether they intend to move for consolidation and/or a stay of this case. In the alternative, the parties may notify me of a pending motion for consolidation or file appropriate motions for stay within 10 days of the date of this Order.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/3/14. (LGK)
October 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/14/2014. (1) Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company L.P.' s claims against defendant Verizon California Inc. are hereby SEVERED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. It is further ORDERED thi s case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United StatesDistrict Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, as to Defendant Verizon California Inc. only. Clerk is DIRECTED to take all steps necessary to effectuate this transfer. After tra nsfer of defendant Verizon California Inc. as set forth above. Sprint Communications Company L.P. SHALL REMAIN the plaintiff and Pacific Bell Telephone Company, doing business as AT&T California, SHALL REMAIN the defendant in action in United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon California, Inc.
Represented By: Henry Weissmann
Represented By: Margaret G. Maraschino
Represented By: Theodore J. MacDonald, Jr.
Represented By: Tamerlin J. Godley
Represented By: Michael L. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Represented By: Charles W. Steese
Represented By: Kimberly A. Smiley
Represented By: John T. Osgood
Represented By: Richard L. Brophy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?