Grigsby v. Harris

Grigsby v. Harris

Petitioner:	Dustin Matthew Grigsby
Respondent:	Bill Harris
Case Number:	4:2014cv01849
Filed:	November 3, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Within US but Outside District
Presiding Judge:	Nannette A. Baker
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 19, 2014	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling after Grigsbys state remedies are exhausted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that I will not issue a certificate of appealability.An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/18/14. (ARL)
November 6, 2014	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to Grigsby a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form for use in § 2254 cases.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Grigsby shall either submit his completed in formapauperis for m or pay the $5 filing fee within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one days of this Order Grigsby shall show cause why the instant petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust available state remedies. Response to Court due by 11/27/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 11/6/14. (CLA) cc: copy mailed to petitioner

Date Filed

Document Text

November 19, 2014

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling after Grigsbys state remedies are exhausted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that I will not issue a certificate of appealability.An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/18/14. (ARL)

November 6, 2014

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to Grigsby a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form for use in § 2254 cases.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Grigsby shall either submit his completed in formapauperis for m or pay the $5 filing fee within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one days of this Order Grigsby shall show cause why the instant petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust available state remedies. Response to Court due by 11/27/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 11/6/14. (CLA) cc: copy mailed to petitioner

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grigsby v. Harris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Dustin Matthew Grigsby
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Bill Harris
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?