Griffin v. Asbury Automotive St. Louis, LLC
Plaintiff: Leslie Griffin
Defendant: Asbury Automotive St. Louis, LLC
Case Number: 4:2014cv01921
Filed: November 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Charles
Presiding Judge: Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MODIFYING AND CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to vacate or modify arbitration award 19 is granted only to the following extent: the award is modified to require plaintiff to return the subj ect car to defendant and satisfy any outstanding loans relating to it within ten (10) days of defendants payment of the award, and the award as modified is confirmed. In all other respects, the motion is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff 's counter-motion to confirm arbitration award 22 is granted only to the extent set out above; and in all other respects, including the request for additional damages and fees, the motion is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a reply brief 23 is granted. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is issued this same date. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on Janaury 5, 2016. (MCB)
November 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay of this matter 17 is lifted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant shall file its supplemental memorandum in support of its motion to vacate, together with complete copies of any transcripts previously filed with the Court, no later than November 25, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file her opposition to the motion to vacate as set out above no later than December 15, 2015. No further briefing or a hearing will be permitted on this issue. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/18/2015. (CBL)
April 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to compel arbitration [# 10 ] is granted, and the parties are compelled to arbitrate their underlying dispute in accordance with the rules of the AAA as set ou t in the arbitration agreement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to stay [# 11 -2] is granted, this case is stayed pending completion of arbitration, and the alternative motion to dismiss [# 11 -1] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall file status reports regarding the progress of the arbitration every 90 days and a notice to the Court within ten days of the conclusion of arbitration. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 04/17/2015. (CBL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griffin v. Asbury Automotive St. Louis, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leslie Griffin
Represented By: Erika J. Wentzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Asbury Automotive St. Louis, LLC
Represented By: Corey L. Kraushaar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?