Ivory v. Cassady
Petitioner: Christopher James Ivory
Respondent: Jay Cassady
Case Number: 4:2014cv02093
Filed: December 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Within US but Outside District
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Presiding Judge: Thomas C. Mummert
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Josh Hawley, the present Attorney General of the State of Missouri, is SUBSTITUTED for Chris Koster as a Respondent in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's requests for an evidentia ry hearing and a "Federal Public Defender" with respect to ground 4 [see ECF No. 1 at 14] are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petit ioner's request for credit on his kidnapping sentence [ECF No. 50] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motions for Certificates of Appealability [ECF Nos. 45, 46, 47, 48, and 49] are DENIED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Court will not issue a Certificate of Appealability. A separate judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/16/18. (LGK)
June 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER for 39 Report and Recommendations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Cohens Report and Recommendation # 39 filed on May 13, 2016 is adopted and sustained in its entirety.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners request for a certificate of appealability with respect to the granting of Respondents second motion for an extension of time # 37 is DENIED and the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 6/6/16. (ARL)
February 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Cohens Report and Recommendation # 31 , filed on February 2, 2016, is adopted and sustained in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents' motion to set aside the show-cause order # 15 is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Respondents' motion to dismiss # 16 and Petitioner's motion for stay and abeyance # 22 are DENIED in part and GRANTED in part so that the two unexhausted grounds for relief, groun ds ten and thirty, are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an Amended Case Management Order referring this case back to Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen for a report and recommendation on all dispositive and non-dispositive matters and re-setting case management deadlines will be issued by separate order. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 2/26/16. (CAR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ivory v. Cassady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher James Ivory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jay Cassady
Represented By: Stephen D. Hawke
Represented By: Jessica Madeleine Mckee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?