Burke v. St. Louis City Jails et al
| Calvin Burke |
| St. Louis City Jails, Dale Glass, Leonard Edwards, Tonya Harry, Gerome Fields, Scott Weber, Unknown Ruckner, Carlton Prince and Social Worker, Idowu |
| 4:2014cv02107 |
| December 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Ronnie L. White |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 111 ) is GRANTED. An appropriate Judgment is filed herewith. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on September 12, 2017. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 98 ) and Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (ECF No. 99 ) are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/28/2016. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 97 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 09/20/2016. (KCB)
|
|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 89 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Discovery (ECF No. 91 ) is GRANTED, in part. The parties have until September 30, 2016 to complete discovery. Any motions for summary judgment must be filed no later than November 1, 2016. Opposition briefs must be filed no later than December 1, 2016, and any reply brief may be fil ed no later than December 11, 2016. Failure to timely file a motion for summary judgment will waive a party's right to do so before trial. ( Discovery Completion due by 9/30/2016., Dispositive Motions due by 11/1/2016.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 8/1/2016. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Derek Peterson's motion to dismiss [ECF No. 68 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on March 14, 2016. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to serve process on defendant Carlton Prince at his last known residential address. The summons must be filed under seal. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on February 17, 2016. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than December 28, 2015, plaintiff must inform the Court of Captain Unknown Irving's correct name. If plaintiff fails to provide the Court with this information, the Court will dismiss Captain Unknown Irving without prejudice. (Response to Court due by 12/28/2015.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on November 24, 2015. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for inmate funds [ECF No. 56 ] is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 11/10/2015. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs official-capacity claims are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED.that defendant St. Louis City Jails is DISMISSED. IT IS. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to docket Tom Raye as a defendant in this action rather than as a plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to serve process on defendants in their individual capacities. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 09/25/2015. (KCB)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to certify class [ECF No. 36 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to docket plaintiffs proposed second amended complaint [ECF No. 36- 4 ]. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on September 15, 2015. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief [ECF Nos. 3, 5] are DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on September 2, 2015. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to submit a certified copy of this Order to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 5/27/15. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 9 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on February 10, 2015. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration [ECF No. 7 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 1/28/2015. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed m forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay the $400 filing fee no later than January 26, 2015. laintiff is instruct ed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United StatesDistrict Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to timely pay the filing fee, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings. re: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Calvin Burke. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 1/12/15. (JWJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
