Meeks v. Cassady

Meeks v. Cassady

Petitioner:	Chavis Meeks
Respondent:	Jay Cassady
Case Number:	4:2015cv00016
Filed:	January 2, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
Presiding Judge:	Audrey G. Fleissig
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 16, 2015	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondent, because petitioner did not exhaust available state remedies before invoking federal habeas corpus jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, without prejudice, for petitioner's failure to exhaust available state remedies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners request for stay and abeyance [Doc. # 5 , p. 6] is DENIED. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/16/2015. (NEB)
January 27, 2015	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondent. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not d ismiss the instant application for failure to exhaust available state remedies. Petitioners failure to file a show cause response shall result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice. Response to Court due by 2/26/2015. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/27/15. (JWJ)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 16, 2015

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondent, because petitioner did not exhaust available state remedies before invoking federal habeas corpus jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, without prejudice, for petitioner's failure to exhaust available state remedies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners request for stay and abeyance [Doc. # 5 , p. 6] is DENIED. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/16/2015. (NEB)

January 27, 2015

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondent. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not d ismiss the instant application for failure to exhaust available state remedies. Petitioners failure to file a show cause response shall result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice. Response to Court due by 2/26/2015. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/27/15. (JWJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meeks v. Cassady
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Chavis Meeks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Jay Cassady
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?