Foster v. Cassady

Foster v. Cassady

Petitioner:	Rodney L. Foster
Respondent:	Jay Cassady
Case Number:	4:2015cv00225
Filed:	February 2, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Within US but Outside District
Presiding Judge:	Shirley P. Mensah
Presiding Judge:	Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 7, 2018	Filing 64 ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order and Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and incorporated herein. [Doc. 62] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rodney Foster's First Amended Pet ition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. [Doc. 53] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rodney Foster's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 1] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED, with no further action to take place herein. An appropriate judgment will accompany this Order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/7/2018. (MRC)
June 22, 2016	Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's Objections to the U.S. Magistrate Judge's April 1, 2016 Order Denying Discovery Under Rule 6 are OVERRULED. [Docs. 28, 29] Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/22/2016. (MRC)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 7, 2018

Filing 64 ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order and Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and incorporated herein. [Doc. 62] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rodney Foster's First Amended Pet ition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. [Doc. 53] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rodney Foster's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 1] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED, with no further action to take place herein. An appropriate judgment will accompany this Order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/7/2018. (MRC)

June 22, 2016

Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's Objections to the U.S. Magistrate Judge's April 1, 2016 Order Denying Discovery Under Rule 6 are OVERRULED. [Docs. 28, 29] Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/22/2016. (MRC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foster v. Cassady
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodney L. Foster
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Jay Cassady
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?