Nukic v. MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Alija Nukic
Defendant: MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. and Thomas Fred Junker
Case Number: 4:2015cv00491
Filed: March 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/13/15. (JWD)
April 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Remand # 12 is DENIED without prejudice at this time.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is granted ten (10) days from the date of this Order to submit a binding stipulation, dec laration or affidavit to this court that he will not seek, ask for or accept an amount of damages in excess of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs, signed by both plaintiff and counsel for plaintiff. In addition, plaintiff shall stipulat e that if the case is remanded, he will agree to file in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis an identical binding stipulation, declaration or affidavit signed by both plaintiff and counsel for plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits such a stipulation, declaration, or affidavit, the Court will reconsider the Motion to Remand. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/7/15. (ARL)
March 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant shall show cause in writing, within 10 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction by providing sufficient evidence for the Court to find, b y a preponderance of the evidence, that the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional threshold. Plaintiffs may file any opposition to defendants evidence, and/or a motion for remand, 10 days thereafter. Show Cause Response due by 3/30/2015.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/20/15. (JWD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nukic v. MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alija Nukic
Represented By: Thomas E. Schwartz
Represented By: Richard A. Voytas, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc.
Represented By: Scott D. Bjorseth
Represented By: David A. Schott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Fred Junker
Represented By: Scott D. Bjorseth
Represented By: David A. Schott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?