Miller v. Cottrell, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Norman Miller
Defendant: Cottrell, Inc., Auto Handling Corporation, General Motors Company and General Motors LLC
Case Number: 4:2015cv00577
Filed: April 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Charles
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF REMAND IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for remand # 23 is GRANTED, and this case is remanded to the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Missouri, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot. 16 Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 8/4/15. cc: St. Charles(CLA)
April 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant shall show cause in writing, no later than May 8, 2015, that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action by providing sufficient support for its argument that this Court sho uld disregard the citizenship of Auto Handling Corporation based on the doctrine of fraudulent joinder, and/or demonstrating that there is federal question jurisdiction over this action. Plaintiff may file any opposition to defendant's arguments, and/or a motion for remand, no later than May 18, 2015. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/29/15. (JWD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Cottrell, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cottrell, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel J. Carpenter
Represented By: Amy J. Lorenz-Moser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Auto Handling Corporation
Represented By: Ted L. Perryman
Represented By: Korissa M. Zickrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors Company
Represented By: Stephen L. Beimdiek
Represented By: Sarah J. Hugg-Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Represented By: Stephen L. Beimdiek
Represented By: Sarah J. Hugg-Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norman Miller
Represented By: Charles W. Armbruster
Represented By: Michael T. Blotevogel
Represented By: Brian M. Wendler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?