St. Louis County v. Johnson

St. Louis County v. Johnson

Plaintiff:	St. Louis County
Defendant:	Carol Johnson
Case Number:	4:2015cv00746
Filed:	May 11, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Stephen N. Limbaugh
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1455
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 28, 2015	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion for relief of the remand order [Doc. #13] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion to amend the remand order [Doc. #12] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/28/2015. (JMC)
May 12, 2015	Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for extension of time to file a copy of the State Court file [Doc. #6] is DE NIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is REMANDED to St. Louis County Circuit Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Order to the St. Louis County Circuit Court, with reference to Carol Johnson v. Mu ncipal Court Division, et al., Case No. 14SL-CC03078. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Terminate Case (ORDER FORWARDED TO ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/12/2015. (JMC)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 28, 2015

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion for relief of the remand order [Doc. #13] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion to amend the remand order [Doc. #12] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/28/2015. (JMC)

May 12, 2015

Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for extension of time to file a copy of the State Court file [Doc. #6] is DE NIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is REMANDED to St. Louis County Circuit Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Order to the St. Louis County Circuit Court, with reference to Carol Johnson v. Mu ncipal Court Division, et al., Case No. 14SL-CC03078. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Terminate Case (ORDER FORWARDED TO ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/12/2015. (JMC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: St. Louis County v. Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: St. Louis County
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carol Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?