Ramsey v. St. Charles County et al
| Patsha Ramsey |
| St. Charles County, St. Charles County Sheriff's Department, St. Charles County Jail and Larry Crawford |
| 4:2015cv00776 |
| May 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| John A. Ross |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 39 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part in accordance with the rulings herein. This case remains set for trial on July 24, 2017. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/30/2017. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's counsel shall file an amended complaint within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order, stating whether Plaintiff is suing the defendants in their official capacity, individual capacity, or both individual and official capacities. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with the Court's instructions will result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice. Response to Court due by 7/8/2015. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/18/15. (KXS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
