Thompson v. Villmer et al
Plaintiff: Gregory Thompson
Defendant: Tom Villmer, Wendy Dashner and James Ford
Case Number: 4:2015cv01012
Filed: June 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 192 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial [Doc. No. 173 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/9/2022. (JEB)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 93 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 77 ] is GRANTED as to Defendant Wendy Dashner and DENIED as to Defendant James Ford. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 80 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/25/18. (KJS)
October 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is before the Court on its own motion. The Office of the Missouri Attorney General has notified the Court that it cannot waive service for defendant James Ford because he is no longer employed by the State of Mis souri. As a result, the Court will direct defense counsel to submit to the Court, under seal, the last known residential address for defendant James Ford. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defense counsel will provide the Court with defendant James Ford's last known address, under seal, no later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. Response to Court due by 11/17/2016.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 10/27/2016. (MRC)
March 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's post- dismissal motion to amend his complaint is GRANTED. (Doc. 10)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Memorandum and Order and Order of Dismissal entered on November 30, 2015 , are VACATED. (Docs. 8 and 9) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REOPENED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint on a court -form setting forth in detail his claims against defendant James Ford. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after plaintiff submits his second amended complaint in this action, the Court will review this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. I T IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order could result in a dismissal of this action, without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide plaintiff with a copy of the Court' ;s form complaint for filing Prisoner Section 1983 Cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. ( Response to Court due by 4/16/2016.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/17/2016. (MRC)
November 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent plaintiff has alleged any state law claims against defendant Ford, these claims are also DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/30/2015. (MRC)
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. [Doc. 2] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $4.48 within thirty (30) d ays of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERE D that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Wendy Dashner or Tom Villmer because, as to these defendants, the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief c an be granted, or both. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on a court-form setting forth in detail his claims against defendant James Ford. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after plaintiff submits his amended complaint in this action, the Court will review this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to comply with this Memo randum and Order could result in a dismissal of this action, without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat the Clerk shall provide plaintiff with a copy of the Court's form complaint for filing Prisoner Section 1983 Cases. IT IS FUR THER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. An Order of Partial Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. ( Initial Filing Fee due by 10/22/2015., Response to Court due by 10/22/2015.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/22/2015. (MRC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Villmer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Villmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wendy Dashner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?