T.W. v. Colvin

T.W. v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	T.W.
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	4:2015cv01034
Filed:	July 1, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Shirley P. Mensah
Presiding Judge:	E. Richard Webber
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 3, 2016	Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded $3,241.15 in attorney fees to be paid by the Social Security Administration. These amounts should be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney after it is determined the claimant does not have any outstanding federal debt subject to collection. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 8/3/2016. (CBL)
May 6, 2016	Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation, and hereby sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation in its entirety.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Comm issioner be REVERSED and that this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. SEction 405(g). Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on May 6, 2016. (MCB)(Certified copy of Memorandum and Order sent to: Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Room 801, Skyline Tower #1, Falls Church, VA 22041 this date.)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 3, 2016

Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded $3,241.15 in attorney fees to be paid by the Social Security Administration. These amounts should be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney after it is determined the claimant does not have any outstanding federal debt subject to collection. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 8/3/2016. (CBL)

May 6, 2016

Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation, and hereby sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation in its entirety.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Comm issioner be REVERSED and that this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. SEction 405(g). Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on May 6, 2016. (MCB)(Certified copy of Memorandum and Order sent to: Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Room 801, Skyline Tower #1, Falls Church, VA 22041 this date.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: T.W. v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: T.W.
Represented By:	Michael A. Ferry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Jane Rund(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?