Radoncic et al v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. et al
| Salko Radoncic, Adis Radoncic and Halil Todic |
| Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., Casino One Corp., Tropicana Entertainment Inc., Four Seasons Hotels, Limited, Missouri Gaming Commission, Trooper Collins, John Does 1-6 and Jane Doe #1 |
| 4:2015cv01194 |
| August 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Casino Defendant' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (ECF No. 6 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, in accordance with the foregoing. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 01/28/2016. (CLK)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Missouri Gaming Commissions Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED, and Missouri Gaming Commission is DISMISSED as a Defendant in this matter. 17 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 1/4/16. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Remand (ECF No. 22 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Casino Defendants Motion for Attorneys Fees and Expenses Incurred in Opposing Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (ECF No. 28 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 12/16/15. (KJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
