In Re: in the Matter of Osage Marine Services, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Eastern District In Re: in the Matter of Osage Marine Services, Inc.

In Re: in the Matter of Osage Marine Services, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Osage Marine Services, Inc.
Case Number:	4:2015cv01458
Filed:	September 23, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	John A. Ross
Nature of Suit:	Marine
Cause of Action:	46 U.S.C. § 0181
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 26, 2016	Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Claimants Joint Motion to Dissolve Restraining Order [ 31 ] is GRANTED. The stay and restraining order entered by the Court on January 21, 2016 is DISSOLVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a stay of entr y of judgment and consequent enforcement of any recovery achieved in a proceeding pending the outcome of this limitation proceeding is entered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall administratively close this file, subject to reopening on motion of either party as warranted. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the parties shall file a status report with the Court on October 25, 2016 and every six (6) months thereafter. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/26/16. (JAB)
January 15, 2016	Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Claimants Alternative Motion for Extension of Time to File Claim 10 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Claimants Motion to Dissolve Restraining Order 12 is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 18 is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/15/2016. (KMS)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 26, 2016

Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Claimants Joint Motion to Dissolve Restraining Order [ 31 ] is GRANTED. The stay and restraining order entered by the Court on January 21, 2016 is DISSOLVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a stay of entr y of judgment and consequent enforcement of any recovery achieved in a proceeding pending the outcome of this limitation proceeding is entered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall administratively close this file, subject to reopening on motion of either party as warranted. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the parties shall file a status report with the Court on October 25, 2016 and every six (6) months thereafter. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/26/16. (JAB)

January 15, 2016

Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Claimants Alternative Motion for Extension of Time to File Claim 10 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Claimants Motion to Dissolve Restraining Order 12 is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 18 is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/15/2016. (KMS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: in the Matter of Osage Marine Services, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Osage Marine Services, Inc.
Represented By:	Ronald E. Fox
Represented By:	Jeremy Thomas Staley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?