Doe v. Rainey et al
| Jane Doe |
| Martin Rainey, Randy Esphorst and Gasconade County, Missouri |
| 4:2015cv01484 |
| September 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Gasconade |
| Audrey G. Fleissig |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed motion to lift the stay imposed by this Court on January 3, 2017, is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 99 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before March 1, 2017, the parties shall submit a new joint proposed scheduling plan for the continued litigation of this case. (Joint Scheduling Plan due by 3/1/2017.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on February 22, 2017. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Randy Esphorst and Gasconade County's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Counts IV, V, VII, and VIII of Plaintiff's amended complaint is DENIED. (Doc. No. 39 .) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on May 24, 2016. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Rainey's motion to dismiss Count II of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/17/2016. (NEB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
