Rafferty v. Rafferty et al
Jeanne U. Rafferty |
Kathe Rafferty, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
Kathe Rafferty |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
Jeanne U. Rafferty |
4:2015cv01543 |
October 7, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Charles A. Shaw |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Kathe Rafferty's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P., is GRANTED. [Doc. 12] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff' ;s claims in Counts I and V, and defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company's counterclaim and cross-claim for interpleader, are STAYED pending resolution of the ERISA declaratory judgment matter Rafferty v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., et al., No. 1:15-CV-206 BR, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case will be administratively closed, and may be reopened on motion following the final decision of the court i n Rafferty v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., et al., No. 1:15-CV-206 BR (W.D. Pa). An appropriate order of partial dismissal and administrative closure will accompany this memorandum and order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 1/27/2016. (MRC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.