Manning v. USA

Manning v. USA

Petitioner:	Michael Manning
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	4:2015cv01551
Filed:	October 7, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Carol E. Jackson
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 21, 2017	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to alter or amend judgment [Doc. # 16 ] is denied. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 8/21/2017. (CLO)
April 20, 2017	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that motion and the files and records of this case conclusively show that Manning is not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on any of the claims he asserts his mot ion to vacate. Therefore, the motion will be denied without a hearing. See Engelen v. United States, 68 F.3d 238, 240 (8th Cir. 1995). Additionally, the Court finds that Manning has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Therefore, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 4/20/2017. (CLO)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 21, 2017

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to alter or amend judgment [Doc. # 16 ] is denied. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 8/21/2017. (CLO)

April 20, 2017

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that motion and the files and records of this case conclusively show that Manning is not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on any of the claims he asserts his mot ion to vacate. Therefore, the motion will be denied without a hearing. See Engelen v. United States, 68 F.3d 238, 240 (8th Cir. 1995). Additionally, the Court finds that Manning has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Therefore, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 4/20/2017. (CLO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manning v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Tiffany G. Becker(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By:	Erin O. Granger(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Manning
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?