Brown v. STLCC Dist Board
| Theo Brown |
| STLCC Dist Board |
| 4:2015cv01571 |
| October 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Theodis Brown's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal 50 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Brown shall, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, either pay the $505 appellate filing fee or file a motion in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no additional motions shall be filed in this closed case. Any future documents or pleadings in connection with Browns appeal shall be filed directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 3/22/2018. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to set aside the judgment in this action [Doc. # 47 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no additional motions shall be filed in this closed case. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 3/12/18. (EAB)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of this action [Doc. # 26 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 1/7/16. (EAB)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the amended complaint because plaintiff has failed to comply with this Courts Order of November 9, 2015. See Fed.R.Civ.P.41(b ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motions to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2, #3, #5 and #13] are DENIED as plaintiff has failed to provide the Court with a CJA Form 23 Financial Affidavit, thus his financial status cannot be ascertained. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motions for appointment of counsel [Doc.#2, #3, #5] are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs remaining motions [Doc. #14, #16 and #19] are also DENIED AS MOOT. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on December 29, 2015. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall provide plaintiff with a financial affidavit form that plaintiff must complete and send back to this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court sh all provide to plaintiff, along with a copy of this Order, a blank complaint form for the filing of an employment discrimination complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, in accordance with the instructions set forth above, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a completed financial affidavit no later than thirty days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff's failure t o file a completed financial affidavit within thirty days of the date of this Order will result in a dismissal of this case without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint or fails to comply with the instructions set forth above relating to the filing of the amended complaint, the Court shall dismiss this action without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon the filing of the amended complaint, it will be subject to review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/9/2015. (Order and forms mailed to Mr. Brown this date.)(CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. STLCC Dist Board | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Theo Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STLCC Dist Board | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
