Biomedical Systems Corporation v. Crawford
| Biomedical Systems Corporation |
| Cheryl Crawford |
| Cheryl Crawford |
| Biomedical Systems Corporation |
| 4:2015cv01775 |
| December 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF REMAND. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Biomedical Systems Corporation's Motion to Remand [ECF # 9 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is remanded to the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, from which it was removed. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 1/13/2016. (Certified copy of Order and docket sheet sent to St. Louis County Circuit Court this date.)(CBL)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Cheryl Crawford shall show cause in writing no later than December 14, 2015, why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by supplementing her Notice of Removal as set out herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Biomedical may file any opposition to defendant's Notice of Removal no later than December 21, 2015. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/3/2015. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
