Blecha v. Colvin

Blecha v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	John Christopher Blecha
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	4:2015cv01784
Filed:	December 3, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Shirley P. Mensah
Presiding Judge:	Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 31, 2017	Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's application for attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act is GRANTED. [Doc. 30 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Commissioner o f Social Security shall pay attorney's fees under the EAJA in the amount of Six Thousand Three Hundred Eighty Dollars and Eighty Cents ($6,380.80), and that the award shall be made payable to plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 8/31/17. (JWD)
March 8, 2017	Filing 28 ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and incorporated herein. [Doc. 27] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. An appropriate judgment of remand will accompany this order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/8/2017. (MRC)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 31, 2017

Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's application for attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act is GRANTED. [Doc. 30 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Commissioner o f Social Security shall pay attorney's fees under the EAJA in the amount of Six Thousand Three Hundred Eighty Dollars and Eighty Cents ($6,380.80), and that the award shall be made payable to plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 8/31/17. (JWD)

March 8, 2017

Filing 28 ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and incorporated herein. [Doc. 27] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. An appropriate judgment of remand will accompany this order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/8/2017. (MRC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blecha v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Christopher Blecha
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Jane Rund(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?