Sapa v. Florence

Sapa v. Florence

Plaintiff:	Robert Sapa
Defendant:	Fredrica Florence
Case Number:	4:2015cv01787
Filed:	December 3, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit:	Copyrights
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2016	Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference [ECF # 6 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff may serve immediate discovery on third party ISP Yahoo, Inc. to obtain the true identity of defendant Fredrica Florence by serving a subpoena pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 that seeks information sufficient to identify "Fredrica Florence". (SEE FULL ORDER FOR ALL REQUIREMENTS.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rule 45 subpoena served upon Yahoo, Inc., pursuant to this Order shall have a copy of this Order attached. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 1/11/2016. (CBL)
December 14, 2015	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Serve Defendant by Alternative Means [ECF # 2 ] is DENIED. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (Rev. 2015), plaintiff shall cause service to be effected upon defendant not later than ninety days after the filing of his complaint. Failure to timely effectuate service may result in the dismissal of this action against defendant without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/14/2015. (CBL)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2016

Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference [ECF # 6 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff may serve immediate discovery on third party ISP Yahoo, Inc. to obtain the true identity of defendant Fredrica Florence by serving a subpoena pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 that seeks information sufficient to identify "Fredrica Florence". (SEE FULL ORDER FOR ALL REQUIREMENTS.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rule 45 subpoena served upon Yahoo, Inc., pursuant to this Order shall have a copy of this Order attached. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 1/11/2016. (CBL)

December 14, 2015

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Serve Defendant by Alternative Means [ECF # 2 ] is DENIED. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (Rev. 2015), plaintiff shall cause service to be effected upon defendant not later than ninety days after the filing of his complaint. Failure to timely effectuate service may result in the dismissal of this action against defendant without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/14/2015. (CBL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sapa v. Florence
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Sapa
Represented By:	Arthur K. Shaffer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Fredrica Florence
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?